Search for: "v. Smith" Results 6681 - 6700 of 16,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2015, 9:44 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Ben Affleck’s appearance at San Diego Comic Con this past weekend to promote his upcoming film, Batman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 7:23 pm by Joy Waltemath
” This distinction, explained the court, was recognized in Etsitty in a footnote citing to the Sixth Circuit case, Smith v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:49 am
  That is precisely what plaintiffs were asking the court to do in Krupp v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:26 pm
Egan Head of Research & Information Services – Americas, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY; Linda-Jean Schneider, Electronic Resources Manager,Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Philadelphia, PA From Books to Bytes: The Transformation of Legal Research in Law Firms, By Jean O’Grady, Director of Research Services, DLA Piper,Washington, DC Law Firm Recruiting: Support the Recruiting Process By Ronda Fisch, Director of Research & Library Systems, Reed… [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
 Nikos tells all.* Convatec v Smith & Nephew: why the Court of Appeal was wrongThe IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 on silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here and Darren here). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Schachtman
Smith, whose testimony has been the subject of several judicial exclusions for lack of validity. [7] Lorillard, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Labour Law: TerminationWilson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
There's definitely something wrong ...The IPKat has reported already twice on the interesting Court of Appeal, England and Wales, decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v ConvaTec Technologies Inc, relating to ConvaTec's patent EP (UK) 1,343,510 relating to silverised wound dressings (see Jeremy here, and this Kat here). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Smith, in which the Court prohibited an after-the-fact referendum from interfering with a state’s (already finalized) ratification of a federal constitutional amendment under Article V of the Constitution, which also uses the word “Legislature. [read post]