Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 11,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Nest: Court & Judge InformationCourt Case Number: 0:12-cv-00299-SRN-JSM File Date: Monday, February 06, 2012 Plaintiff: Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm
In more detail, the Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:03 am
Kimball Inter’l, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:19 am
Louis–based Carey, Danis & Lowe, with offices in Missouri and Illinois, handles personal injury, pharmaceutical liability, product liability, medical malpractice, class action and commercial cases throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
The inventor-friendly principles that governed the original United States Patent Office back when Thomas Jefferson ran it (though he personally wasn’t too much a fan of patents) are still the law today, even though the scope of prior art in most industries has expanded far beyond the point where any patent examiner could reasonably review it, much less ensure an inventor in an ex parte proceeding fairly describes it. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am
Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:29 am
Late last month, however, a First Circuit panel of the United States Court of Appeals held that Rule 702 required perscrutation of expert witness opinion, and then proceeded to perscrutate perspicaciously, in Samaan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division at Lafayette. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
AT & T Corp., 484 F.3d 644 (3d Cir.2007). [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:28 am
To that I would respond that I have read many communications apparently from you that either state explicitly that you are an attorney ("I am an attorney if that helps you sleep at night" [http://whitecoatunderground.com/2011/12/01/when-did-the-burzynski-clinic-start-harassing-bloggers/]) to ones where you imply that you are an attorney ("So, when I present to the juror that my client and his cancer treatment has went up against 5 Grand Juries which involved the Food and Drug… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 5:59 am
Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness USA Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:49 am
” Ranbaxy Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm
Commerce's finding of "critical circumstances" means that if the agency imposes preliminary countervailing duties on March 2, the duties will apply to all imports of cells and modules from Chinese exporters that were brought into the United States starting December 3, 2011. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
Justice Department wants the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to back its efforts to keep graphic photos depicting the death of Osama bin Laden from seeing the light of day.In a supporting memorandum to its summary judgment motion to the Court in the case of Judicial Watch, Inc. v. [read post]
