Search for: "In re T. W." Results 6701 - 6720 of 8,740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
[W]e're not going to agree on every single issue, but what we have to do is to be able to create an atmosphere . . . where we can disagree without being disagreeable and then focus on those things that we hold in common as Americans.During the course of the entire inaugural festivities, there are going to be a wide range of viewpoints that are presented. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Dissent: We're supposed to analyze the law using evidence and considering gov't interests at stake, not just nod to the legal standard with conclusory rhetoric. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:15 pm
He was sure he was getting the "shaft" (to paraphrase that immortal C & W song, "She Got the Gold Mine and I Got the Shaft"). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm by admin
  “We’re not going to sell anything at a loss or a fire sale,” said Fish. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:07 am
Insofern wäre er als erstes Buch zum Thema für Studenten empfehlenswert. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
(In re Dickson) (W.D.N.C. 1977) 432 F.Supp. 752, 756 (Burroughs), and other cases.) [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Dogan: patent in particular tends to come in tension w/TM only in product configuration trade dress. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 2:30 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Don’t be discouraged by long lines: the wait wasn’t bad and I only waited about a half hour to cast my vote. 10:08 a.m. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 2:27 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We explained that we could not accuratelydetermine the impact of the forged document on the jury,noting that “[w]hen it became known that the jury waspresented testimony based on fraudulent documentation,where that testimony was relevant and material to theissue of patent validity, all of the jury’s invalidity findingsbecame suspect. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm by Alden Abbott
Recently departed Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Commissioner Noah Phillips has been rightly praised as “a powerful voice during his four-year tenure at the FTC, advocating for rational antitrust enforcement and against populist antitrust that derails the fair yet disruptive process of competition. [read post]
11 May 2007, 7:20 am
You sure ain't boring, Lawrence -- your morality is emotional as well as intellectual -- and you're always perfectly INTELLIGIBLE. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 5:06 am
The claimed structure was in error, due to a re-arrangement taking place unbeknownst to the inventors. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Appeal by mother against refusal to re-open fact-finding inquiry. [read post]