Search for: "MATTER OF P S" Results 6701 - 6720 of 18,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 6:20 am by Ilya Somin
Being attorney general is not just a matter of technical competence. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm by Mark Ashton
It is, however, the custodian’s duty to use the [P]UGMA property for the child’s benefit. 20 Pa.C.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:44 am by Richard Hunt
The court’s resolution of the plaintiff’s motion for default was straightforward. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:53 am by INFORRM
Nor would it be right for any politician to attempt to make his or her own judgement in this matter: that would breach the central Leveson principle, accepted in the cross-party agreement, that politicians must not be the arbiters in matters of press regulation. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 6:49 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
” Accordingly, the Banco Totta e Acores court held that the participant’s reliance on the lead bank’s representations was not justifiable as a matter of law and granted summary judgment for the lead bank. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As wenoted in Chou, “being considered an inventor of importantsubject matter is a mark of success in one’s field, comparableto being an author of an important scientific paper. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
Katfriend Pär Öhman (Bildombudsmannen AB) explains the content of last year's decision.* Swedish Patent and Registration Office refuses registration of figurative mark because contrary to morality and public orderIs a figurative sign representing a hand with a raised middle finger contrary to morality and public order? [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 11:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Narin's work on high citations of Japanese patents was discussed in Business Week (p. 57 of Aug. 9, 1993 issue), in the Jiji Press Ticker (May 28, 1991), Business America (Vol. 110, p. 13, Sept. 25, 1989 issue) and the New York Times (p. [read post]