Search for: "People v Goode" Results 6701 - 6720 of 22,582
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2013, 10:22 am
 Meanwhile, the good news is that all is not lost. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 6:01 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Code § 3344(a), under which “[a]ny person who knowingly uses another's name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods or services” must first obtain the person’s consent . [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:08 am by David DePaolo
It's not doing anything wrong in terms of the law, or with regard to its shareholders.But the conflict with social responsibility probably means that Schultz, the subject of all this activity, hasn't been in a good place in life since his accident.We need some form of social protection in place for the people that produce the goods and services we consume - it's a critical component to a modern, healthy economy.But maybe the way we have gone about it for the… [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:31 pm by Stewart Baker
  One thing that AI is creepily good at is faking people’s voices. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:54 am
 In re Thomas, 79 U.S.P.Q.2d 1021, 1024 (TTAB 2006) (citing Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Complications might arise, however,  due to  the  degree of consumer sophistication that courts tend to attribute to internet users, see Public Impact v Boston Consulting. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm by Larry
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 5:46 am by David Fraser
I heard about a number of instances where the CyberSCAN unit itself bullied people to remove political content, so taking away their ability to do that is a good thing. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:24 am
 Adds Merpel, yes, just like you put their content to good use too ...Forthcoming attractions. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Isabel McArdle
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]