Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 13,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 11:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 10:50 am
A while back, I started following a cert petition in Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:01 am
Whether a timely demand for arbitration has been made is for the court to determineVillage of Chester v Local 445, Intl. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:12 pm
The petition of the day is: United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:13 pm
Wong and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
” Town of Greece v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
United States, 449 U.S. 383 (1981). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:56 am
Here: 6-30-14 Petition for Rehearing En Banc An excerpt: The panel decision conflicts with the May 19, 2014 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Petrella v.Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 132; 188 L.Ed.2d 979 (2014) (Petrella). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:55 am
SPRAWLDEF v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:37 am
United States held that it applies to corporations. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 pm
Quinn -(1) Whether a state may, consistent with the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, compel personal care providers to accept and financially support a private organization as their exclusive representative to petition the state for greater reimbursements from its Medicaid programs; and (2) whether the lower court erred in holding that the claims of providers in the Home Based Support Services Program are not ripe for… [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am
But there was a chance, a tiny crack, that we could revisit the efficacy of the beloved black box when a petition for a writ of certiorari was submitted to the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Terry Vangelder out of San Diego. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
As Justice Stevens wrote for the Court, “Petitioners contend that they are being held in federal custody in violation of the laws of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:21 am
’ Rawlings v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, “as the arbitrator grounded his reasoning in the evidence, including an assessment of the employee as frank and apologetic,” the Department’s contention that termination is the only appropriate penalty “is without merit,” citing United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v Board of Education, 1 NY3d 72. [read post]
