Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
Dade county is more populous than fifteen of the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:30 am
Google http://t.co/nczgG5qYEq -> Rihanna’s Copyright Woes Not Over http://t.co/tv0mWhH6ow -> California man found guilty of running “revenge porn” website http://t.co/H1pVvNsHj5 -> IP Osgoode Speaks Series Video: The Honourable Mr. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now, county isn't the best unit for this study. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 11:57 am
The Narayananans family argued the panel could avoid the injustice by applying California state law instead. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 11:20 am
In 1986, the United States Supreme Court opined in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:51 pm
Yesterday, as expected, the US District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of human egg donors in Kamakahi v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, the California Supreme Court acknowledged that, under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 11:05 am
United States vaccination requirements have been in the news, particularly following what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has described as “a large, ongoing multi-state outbreak linked to an amusement park in California. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 am
After the recent decision by the United States Supreme Court in Warger v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am
PolhillCase Number: 13-cv-01729 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: September 24, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 6, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-5 SEC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 9:01 am
The United States Supreme Court just last week granted a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:11 pm
In Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:25 pm
Thus, following Iskanian, employers across California hoped that this decision excluding PAGA from the FAA would be taken up and reviewed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
This concept was addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
