Search for: "State v. Losee"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 10:14 am
 When he sought habeas relief after losing challenges in state court, his former commanding officer gave what the called a "moving description of those two battles" - testimony that was "only a fraction of the mitigating evidence that his counsel failed to discover or present during the penalty phaqse of his trial in 1988. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:35 pm
The case, State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am
Although it is possible to win by losing, I generally think one does better to win by winning. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:56 pm
The GC made references to case law both in favour and against taking into account the time at which the EUIPO gives its decision on the opposition - in essence, querying whether the fact that an earlier sign (with an earlier right) could lose such status at a later date (e.g. following the possible withdrawal of a Member State in which the mark enjoys protection) would affect the outcome of the case (see by analogy T-598/18 Grupo Brownie decision, para 19).The GC stated… [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 9:36 am
In A.D.P. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Briggs v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
With Williams v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:51 am
In this context it's good to take a look at Limelight Networks v Akamai Technologies Inc et al. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
In A.D.P. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
In the challenge by 26 states to Congress’s decision in the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid coverage — an expansion that the states claim will simply bust their budgets – the states are relying upon the so-called “coercion theory.” This has to do with the conditions that Congress tells states they must meet in order to qualify for federal funds to help pay for a public program. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 1:53 pm
Sixteen states banned interracial marriage when the court struck that down in Loving v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The householders not only suffer the noise and inconvenience, they lose their right to compensation. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:28 pm
The householders not only suffer the noise and inconvenience, they lose their right to compensation. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
It’s unusual to find an involuntary termination provision in an agreement between 50-50 owners of a business (the exceptions often involve licensed professionals who, by law, cannot remain in ownership if they lose their license). [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:08 am
The latter case emphasises the obligation of a judge to explain the basis of his decision on any given issue sufficiently for (a) the parties, especially the losing party, and (b) an appellate court to understand why he has come to the conclusion stated. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:08 am
The latter case emphasises the obligation of a judge to explain the basis of his decision on any given issue sufficiently for (a) the parties, especially the losing party, and (b) an appellate court to understand why he has come to the conclusion stated. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
However, as the Supreme Court recently reminded us all in Google LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government loses nothing by allowing Twitter to first be heard on whether it objects to being gagged. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 7:05 am
Corp. v. [read post]
