Search for: "State v. White"
Results 6701 - 6720
of 13,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2020, 3:10 am
The curious case of Tweedie v Park Travel Agency (Pty) Ltd t/a Park Tours 1998 (4) SA 802 (W) illustrates the principle. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:53 am
The case of White v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
Thanks to Eric White for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
6 May 2008, 1:38 pm
The state prosecuted Richard and me, and after we were found guilty, the judge declared: "Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am
It has been 15 years since the last brand v brand challenge of a biologic patent in Canada. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 10:49 am
Spokesman Josh Earnest said the White House will send its closure plan to Congress ‘soon. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am
Circuit denied a motion for an initial en banc hearing in Qassim v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
College. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
Archer and White Sales Inc., 17-1272? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
In some ways, this case’s result might be viewed as a matter of “white hats” versus “black hats. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
The Court has also considered that as the advancement of gender equality is today a major goal in the member States of the Council of Europe, very weighty reasons would have to be put forward before such a difference of treatment could be regarded as compatible with the Convention (Konstantin Markin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:27 pm
The White House Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release December 17, 2014 Statement by the President on Cuba Policy Changes Cabinet Room 12:01 P.M. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 9:24 am
Briscoe, et al., v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:15 am
Of course, the White House and Democrats will marshal their legal forces as well, and will “coordinate a state-by-state response to any prospective challenges. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:54 pm
Caesar v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:37 pm
In NetChoice v. [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 1:58 pm
, where the answer is basically because over 200 years of systematic opposition to the idiocy of that system has proved unavailing against the barriers of Article V, most dramatically in 1969, where the Senate, because of a filibuster led by white supremacists Southern senators Sam Ervin and Strom Thurmond, never voted on a proposal that had in fact gained the assent of two-thirds of the House of Representatives and perhaps would have gotten the two thirds had the Senate been… [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 3:01 pm
County (2013) and NFIB v. [read post]
