Search for: "DANIEL v. DANIEL" Results 6721 - 6740 of 8,753
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2011, 7:38 am by Stefanie Levine
Here is this week’s installment of Reexamination Requests from Scott Daniels, of Reexamination Alert and Practice Center Contributor…. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:46 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
We will reproduce some of the highlights here, but time-starved readers can skip to the bottom to see the important lessons.After hearing all the evidence, the court’s findings about the unauthorized transfers were as follows: [36]    [RPS’s senior accountant] Sivaneswaran testified that when he first joined RPS in 2000, it was RPS’ practice whenever it or Daniels Associates, Garland’s other company, needed money, to take an advance from the client accounts… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:27 pm by cdw
The Court also denied cert on a similar claim in Daniel Cook v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Cease v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
The importance of naming a hearing officer in writing is demonstrated by Perez v NYS Dept. of Labor, 665 NYS2d 714. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm by randal shaheen
The Court, however, relied on its recent decision in Famous Horse Inc. v. 5th Ave. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:45 am by Jon Hyman
For more information on this case, I recommend the following summaries and opinions of my fellow bloggers: Unanimous US Supreme Court: Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy Not Violated by NASA Background Check – from Workplace Prof Blog SCOTUS: NASA background check is constitutional – from Ross Runkel’s LawMemo Employment Law Blog Supreme Court: Background Investigations on Federal Contract Employees OK – from Human Resources News … [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:34 pm by David Lat
[Politico]* Today’s decision by the Supreme Court in NASA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Ethan Leib
Once you are already at Amazon looking at HoSang's volume, you should, of course, get your copy of Friend v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Sudeshna Dutta
The grant is the unexpected by-product of a decades-old settlement of a major antitrust class action, City of Detroit v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
After the hacking, it shut off the feature that allowed email addresses to be obtained.The case "has hopefully awakened users to the value of a simple email address," said Jamz Yaneza, a threat research manager at Internet security company Trend Micro Inc.The case is U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:33 pm by cdw
The Court also denied cert on a similar claim today in Daniel Cook v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:38 am by Todd Zywicki
”  The full list of signees is attached as an Appendix to the brief, but among the signatories are two Nobel Laureates in Economics (Vernon Smith and Daniel McFadden) and many household names in economics and law and economics, including Donald Boudreaux, Henry Butler, Tyler Cowen, Harold Demsetz, Richard Epstein, Mark Grady, and a bunch of other people whose names just happen to come later in the alphabet and I fear slighting by my inability to list all of the signatories.In the… [read post]