Search for: "Doe 35" Results 6721 - 6740 of 17,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm by Jason Rantanen
  As the Federal Circuit observed in WBIP, “timing does matter,” Slip Op. at 35 (emphasis in original), a point made in Halo v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 8,601,322 (“the ’322 patent”). [2] You might question whether the claims are valid under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:23 pm by Giles Peaker
That said, 35% to 45% does not seem like a harsh assessment on the reported issues. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:14 am by Melissa Patterson
MPEP 2173.05(g) discusses functional limitations that do not invoke 35 USC 112(f), but can still render the claims indefinite. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:14 am by Melissa Patterson
MPEP 2173.05(g) discusses functional limitations that do not invoke 35 USC 112(f), but can still render the claims indefinite. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Articles 54, 35, 55, and 56 of Protocol I are special protections that supplement this framework because of the extraordinary stakes associated with the objects to which they apply. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
(Matter of Congregation B’Nai Jonah v Kuriansky, 172 AD2d 35, 38-39 [3d Dept 1991]). [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
However, “CEQA does not necessarily call for disapproval of a project having a significant environmental impact, nor does it require the selection of the alternative most protective of the environmental status quo. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am by Dennis Crouch
Does IPR violate the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution? [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am by Kurt R. Karst
EKRA does not define these terms, so the Court looked to the Anti-Kickback Statute. [read post]