Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 3:53 am
The conference will explore the latest case law and legislative reforms across trade marks, designs, GIs, and copyright. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:26 am
A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time by just looking at the involved goods and services and the marks. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 7:26 am
We've seen cases like this before. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:55 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 10, 2023 - 10 AM [In Person]: Edward Levy and Marc Padro v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:13 am
"Thus, while Applicant’s evidence of seven third-party uses is more modest than that found to be determinative in other cases, Cf., e.g., Juice Generation, 115 USPQ2d at 1674-75; Wolfskin, 116 USPQ2d at 1135-36, they remain relevant to show the relative weakness of Registrant’s PLAYBOOK mark. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 7:17 am
" The Board observed that, "perhaps not surprisingly, this case turns in part on the Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:45 am
Cadbury UK Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents Designs And Trade Marks [2018] EWCA Civ 2715 (05 December 2018) is an unedifying case. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:25 am
” (Emphasis by the Board).Trademark Rule 2.41(a)(1) states that a prior registration "may be accepted as prima facie evidence of distinctiveness in appropriate cases. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:03 am
In this case, that other element is the addition of the term PIZZA to Applicant’s mark rendering Opposer’s and Applicant’s marks sufficiently distinguishable that confusion is unlikely.And so the Board dismissed the opposition. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
The Board, however, found that this defense was not pleaded, and in any case the two marks are not legally equivalent as required for tacking.Likelihood of confusion: Applicant sent a cease-and-desist letter to opposer when opposer's SNACK-DUO product first came out, but here applicant contended that confusion is not likely. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 9:57 am
Here is a quick recap of the facts of the case. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:41 am
Finally, a compelling case was made regarding the losses generated by counterfeit goods [material and immaterial alike]. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
In Bose, in comparing WAVE and ACOUSTIC WAVE with POWERWAVE, this court found that the “presence of the root element WAVE, upon this court’s review, introduces a strong similarity in all three marks,” Bose, 293 F.3d at 1378, although in that case the goods were not identical, for the POWERWAVE product was an amplifier rather than a radio.ANDThere is a heavy burden on the newcomer to avoid con- sumer confusion as to products and their source. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 2:00 pm
" Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that "Justices lean toward death row inmate in dispute with lawyer. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:30 pm
" Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that "Justices sympathetic to man deported for minor drug crime. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:40 am
"Obamacare case began when conservative lawyer saw possible flaw in law": David G. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:49 am
The Rescuecom case is just one of many trademark infringement and dilution cases filed in the US and in Europe against Google’s sale of third party trademarks as keywords in its AdWords program. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
The post The Uncertain Case of Deadwood Trademarks appeared first on DuetsBlog. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:53 pm
According to the GC, this conclusion follows from the “evident” intention of the EU legislator, that refrained twice during the legislative process from expressly mentioning in the EU Trademark Regulation that the provision of Article 8(3) could apply also in case where the marks are similar. [read post]
