Search for: "People v. Polite"
Results 6721 - 6740
of 13,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am
The limited coverage and copious exceptions in the proclamation will limit the number of people harmed and thus limit the pool of possible challengers. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 6:32 am
These laws are controversial as many people think that political boycotts of this sort shouldn't be penalized in any way by the government. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:38 am
” The “controversy” here has nothing to do with political views. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
The vast majority of them take their ethical responsibilities seriously, especially when it comes to accepting gifts from people with interests before them and deciding whom they may socialize with if they fear people may be seeking to influence them. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 8:32 am
Bruce Ackerman summarized oral arguments in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 6:17 am
For instance, Article V of the U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Surely people of all political persuasions can agree that blogs and content aggregators are not going to fill that role. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In doing so, the Court looked at the VRA with fresh eyes, devising a legal standard that gives additional leeway to states that have imposed voting restrictions in recent years.The case is Brnovich v. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 11:00 am
Speech rights In the landmark Supreme Court case Tinker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
” She noted, “GPS monitoring generates a precise, comprehensive record of a person's public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations”—something that robust, closed circuit collection of people’s movements would generate as well. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:14 am
Prosecutors accused the man of firing a grenade into a crowd of civilians in 2014, killing at least seven people and injuring three. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:00 am
The issue in Romer v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Canada (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) et al. 2013 FC 6Constitutional Law - Federal jurisdiction (s. 91) – Indians and land reserved for Indians – Indian defined The plaintiffs sought declarations that Métis and Non-status Indians were “Indians” within the meaning of the expression “Indians and lands reserved for Indians” in s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867; (b) that the Queen (in right of Canada) owed a fiduciary duty to… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
Yesterday, in Kaley v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
” Politics is not a “matter of doctrine: it is a matter of prudential political judgment. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
After all, a major development in British “constitutional” politics was the passage of the Fixed Terms Act that, in theory at least, prevents Prime Ministers from calling “snap elections” to the detriment of the political parties seeking to take power themselves.The Fixed Terms Act could, however, be repealed by a subsequent parliament. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
This is because they agreed with the concept of “malinformation,” i.e. there are things that may be true factually, but which may produce political results considered adverse. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
People who are neither criminals nor apologists for criminals might want to consider that when casting their own votes.* See, e.g., Hayden v. [read post]
