Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 6721 - 6740 of 12,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2013, 5:12 am by Simon Fodden
A, 2013 SCC 5, otherwise known as Eric v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm by Joe Consumer
Props to The Washington Spectator for their great weekend investigative piece about the David v. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:03 am by Jamison Koehler
  I am reading an article on ancient Greece, and I am studying the glossy pages for a picture of Helen of Troy. [read post]
29 May 2013, 4:54 am by Susan Brenner
 Moir found a Myspace page for a user called `Mingan’; one of the account's three Myspace `friends’ was Heather Rogers, Brian Rogers's wife. . . . [read post]
28 May 2013, 9:53 am by Florian Mueller
A week ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in a snowplow patent case, Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am by Schachtman
Some people say it’s degrading. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The M & S advertisements would appear on the search engine results page when a consumer, searching the internet for Interflora's services, deployed the word ‘interflora’ as the search term. [read post]
27 May 2013, 12:48 am
Lets mosquitos in, but catsstill can't get out ...For most of us, the word "net" conjures up web pages, search engines, spam and other such delights. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:31 pm by Aparajita Lath
SpicyIP saw a very busy week with many interesting developments -Image from hereThe week started with Sai’s insightful post on Microsoft v Motorola. [read post]
26 May 2013, 6:52 am by Jeff Gamso
  I have nothing interesting to say about it. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:20 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Once I had the chance to read about it and to compare it to the information I had provided in my PGP profile page, I concluded with about 99.9% certainty that I was not among those who had been re-identified by [read post]
24 May 2013, 8:14 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
On the other hand, he said, “a savings clause won’t work if you have all of these prohibitions for two or three pages and then at the end you reference Section 7 but don’t identify what Section 7 is. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Gene Quinn
USPTO Says No Change on Software Patent Eligibility In a one-page memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps dated May 13, 2013, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Drew Hirshfeld had a simple message in response to the Federal Circuit’s en banc non-decision in CLS Bank v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:35 am by Gene Quinn
In a one-page memorandum to the Patent Examining Corps dated May 13, 2013, Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy Drew Hirshfeld had a simple message to respond to the Federal Circuit's en banc non-decision in CLS Bank v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 11:38 am by Dennis Crouch
The Court cites its 1962 decision, Wilbur-Ellis Co. v. [read post]