Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 6721 - 6740 of 156,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Here are today's criminal law Appellate Court opinions:   AC32823 - State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Here are today's criminal law Appellate Court opinions:   AC31381 - State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: Below are today's criminal law Appellate Court opinions:   AC31318 - State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"*  New York State Senate Republican Campaign Committee, Petitioner v Commission To Investigate Public Corruption, Respondent, Supreme Court, New York County, Index Number 159965/2013. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:00 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments today in the "facebook threats" case, Elonis v. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 10:20 am
Pettaway, the state's high court upheld a $ 4 million medical malpractice/wrongful death claim. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by AYESHA CHRISTIE, MATRIX
The court confirmed that a proportionality test (and not an exceptionality test) must be applied, but, as in Hesham Ali, required “appropriate weight” to be given to the Secretary of State’s immigration policy that a person in breach of immigration law must show insurmountable obstacles, or exceptional circumstances (defined as “unjustifiably harsh consequences”), for the public interest in immigration control to be outweighed. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 9:14 am by John P. Feldman and Toam Rubinstein
On May 14, 2018 the Supreme Court of the United States released its decision in Murphy v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:30 pm by Ernster the Virtual Library Cat
Today the United States Supreme court decided a case that is both high profile and right on point for aspiring law students, at the intersection of constitutional law and professional responsibility. [read post]