Search for: "Cash v. Cash"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 8,416
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
When the facts are as unfavorable to the taxpayer as they were in Estate of Malkin v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 7:27 am
Womack v. [read post]
22 May 2010, 10:58 am
In the second example: Assuming a cash (or cash equivalent) negotiation (and/or an alternative $100,000 cash settlement offer), Why and when (from a risk management perspective) should a defendant or liability insurer (post Spencer v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
The Travelers Insurance Co. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:04 am
Bank, Savings and Other Cash Accounts 3. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:16 pm
Supreme Court decisions removing limits on independent campaign expenditures by corporations (Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Dustcontrol International (EPLAW) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Infringement action won't be stayed pending foreign decision in non-patent claim: Elmotech Ltd & Anor v Guidance Ltd & Anor (PatLit) United States US General Director Kappos testimony to Congress (Patently-O) Judge Michel: USPTO should receive $1 billion infusion of cash (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) The US Reporting on IPRs - the Watch List (IP tango) Industrial design in Canada and US -… [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:32 pm
., all transfer taxes, all the time) with a report on a truly resounding taxpayer FLP win: Estate of Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:38 pm
For prior S2KM reporting about Spencer v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:21 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:08 am
Maric alleged that the directors of PLATO had failed to comply with their obligations under Revlon v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:42 am
Maric Capital Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:12 pm
See Rapid-American Corp. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:12 pm
The indictment also charges Ralph V. [read post]
14 May 2010, 12:26 pm
[Post by Venkat] U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:05 pm
See Kates v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:21 am
In R. v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm
Schedule 2.1(b) contains a list of 40 patent applications and patents related to the results of Protogene’s research and development. [23] […] Certain assets are excluded from the Agreement, in particular contractual employment arrangements as well as cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and accounts or notes receivable of the seller. [24] While the Agreement explicitly refers to Protogene’s opposition against the European patent in suit as “an… [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:30 pm
In today’s case (Bodnar v. [read post]
