Search for: "Doe, Inc."
Results 6741 - 6760
of 51,348
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2019, 11:51 am
Simek at Sensei Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
(ComputerXpress, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:01 am
By Eric Goldman Rader Fishman & Grauer PLLC v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 2:10-cv-00191-TS-DN (redacted complaint filed March 30, 2010; answer and counterclaim filed March 25, 2010; counterclaim answer filed April 19, 2010) 1-800 Contacts has been a repeated guest star on this blog, principally for their duplicitous attitudes towards keyword advertising. 1-800 Contacts has used competitive keyword advertising in the past and was part of a coalition that helped scuttle Utah's second… [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm
Kelly Company Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm
Google, Inc., 422 F. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
" Use of two colors does not make this design inherently distinctive.The Board found it "clear from applicant's specimens of use that applicant's mark does not make a separate commercial impression. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
SuperValu Holdings, Inc. (6th Cir. 2/24/12) [pdf] concerns the racial harassment allegations of 11 different employees, spanning 25 years. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:03 am
In Baum Research and Development Company, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:06 pm
” [cite] citing Kenneth Jay Lane, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:22 pm
Advantage Physical Therapy, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 10:50 am
National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm
This kind of harm does not qualify. . . [read post]
Applying Preclusion Based on TTAB Decision, Ohio District Court Denies Non-Infringement Counterclaim
5 Jul 2017, 3:19 am
Buzz Seating Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 2:44 pm
See Bicon, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 8:50 am
“It does affect the class action in the sense that one of the things we were asking the court to do was to stop this conduct on a go-forward basis. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 3:29 am
," under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 on the ground that the specimen of use (below) does not show the mark depicted in the drawing, i.e., the drawing is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as shown on the specimen]. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:01 am
PJ-M2R Restaurant Inc., 2017 ONCA 402 – Mitigation Madness! [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:52 am
See Safer Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:00 am
Give Kids The World, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:54 am
" iFit, Inc. v. [read post]
