Search for: "House v. House"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 41,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 8:35 am
This week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:58 am
Saul and Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:32 am
Glow Concept Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
It would also codify the outcome of Bostock v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:28 pm
The Court, in its questioning, explored the theory that the injured employee could possibly be entitled to overtime pay for working for the benefit of the employer on the weekend, and in excess of the normal work hours.A-48-19 Kim Goulding v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm
Gateway Housing Association v Personal Representatives of Ali & Anor (2020) EWCA Civ 1339 In which the Court of Appeal grapple with the requirement to serve a copy of a notice to quit on the Public Trustee, when serving notice on the personal representative of a deceased tenant. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm
Z & Anor, R (on the application of) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1) (2020) UKSC 40 The issue of the application of the Equality Act to local authority nomination agreements with housing charities reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 9:06 am
Supreme Court issued a series of rulings culminating in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 5:23 am
” Zito v. [read post]
7 Nov 2020, 10:37 pm
(Marbury v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 9:30 pm
" New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: Counterterrorism in American Civil Courts: The Role of Letelier v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:03 pm
And during those 11 days — in full compliance with the rather arbitrary 10-day minimum for an intra-session recess imposed by National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:18 pm
Administrative law — Landlord-tenant dispute — Substantial evidence Appellants, Mahmoud Elgibali and Hanan Elmgdlawi, filed a petition for a writ of administrative mandamus in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County from a hearing officer’s decision in a grievance filed by Appellants against their landlord, City of College Park Housing Authority (“CPHA” or “Appellee”). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
In California v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:07 am
The Supreme Court’s unanimous July 2020 decision in Chiafolo v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Cost v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 4:21 am
Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment required the police to obtain a warrant to access a suspect’s cell phone (Riley v California, in 2014) or to access cell phone tracking data (Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:50 am
What California v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:30 am
And, as Vermeule pointed out, the Court created just such a black hole in Franklin v. [read post]
