Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 6741 - 6760
of 41,391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
Given that the only authorised use of linagliptin is for the purpose specified in the claim (as part of a product containing excipients), this was a powerful factor in determining the circumstances were in place to ensure that linagliptin would be used for that purpose and that Boehringer knew it would be used exclusively for that purpose. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 12:41 am
Given that the only authorised use of linagliptin is for the purpose specified in the claim (as part of a product containing excipients), this was a powerful factor in determining the circumstances were in place to ensure that linagliptin would be used for that purpose and that Boehringer knew it would be used exclusively for that purpose. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:25 pm
Three years ago, this Court stated that it had not yet determined “just how far the equitable powers of the Veterans Court, as an Article I tribunal, extend. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:03 am
In New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts… [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
But I think the Court was right in Packingham v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 8:40 am
Whether such state actors are the "deputized" potential plaintiffs or the court officials and jurists that wield the power of government at every stage of the litigation process, the chilling effect here derives from the bending of state power to such ends. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Lindon and others v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:41 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:10 pm
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000Read More [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:37 am
This is the third post on equity in the United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
On the other hand, in 1997, long before Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:41 pm
Courts have held that failing to appear in court is not an offence of strict liability (R v Hammoud, 2012 ABQB). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
Typically, the state delegates the authority to regulate the admission of attorneys to practice in that state to a bar organization or other state-based institution. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 11:56 am
Terkel v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 5:29 am
So, in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 7:13 pm
These limiting principles are as important in equity as its powers. [read post]
