Search for: "Self v State" Results 6741 - 6760 of 14,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide:  there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It is one of the most embarrassing, self-owning opinions I have ever read.First, a little background.In Griswold v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
It was to avoid this sort of entanglement that the Second Circuit held in Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
" New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:12 am by John Elwood
New Relists Newton v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 6:43 am by Shari Shapiro
  In alleging a violation of the Lanham Act, the Federal act prohibiting false advertising, the Amended Complaint states: USGBC's misrepresentations have an will continue to deceive consumers, voters, taxpayers, developers, municipalities and legislators at the local, state and federal levels. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:30 pm by Aurora Barnes
Kubsch 16-1021 Issue: Whether a state court reasonably applies Chambers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The fact that their challenges have often been taken seriously by the national political community is not just a matter of pragmatism (though that certainly has been a factor): it is also a sign that their self-presentation as representatives of the popular will has at different times been accepted at the federal level, as Fritz, the expert historian of the idea of popular sovereignty, explains (p. 36). [read post]