Search for: "State v. Register" Results 6741 - 6760 of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:19 am
196/11 P, Formula One Licensing BV v OHIM, Global Sports Media Ltd, on an opposition relating to a Community trade mark that was filed a little over eight years ago and which may still have a few more years' mileage to it. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
30 May 2011, 2:21 pm by charley foster
The supplemental brief statedThe Hawaiian sovereignty defense in this particular case stems from the fact that the Appellant stated he was a citizen of the Hawaiian Kingdon and not bound by the laws of the State of Hawaii and that the vehicle was registered with the Reinstated Hawaiian Kingdom....The essence of [Defendant's] Hawaiian sovereignty defense assertion is that the Kingdom of Hawaii exists as the only legal entity capable of allowing him to drive.Ultimately… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm
Environmental Defense, 716 F.2d at 920 (quoting State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Giles Peaker
Nikolaeva v London Borough of Redbridge (2020) EWCA Civ 1586 A quick note on this Court of Appeal decision concerning offers of permanent accommodation in discharge of duty. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 8:01 am by Dan Bressler
The defendant lawyer did not contact the plaintiff at the time the third mortgage was registered. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am by Cicely Wilson
” The Terminal is within the City’s Old and Historic District which is listed on the National Register of Historic Places maintained by the United States Department of the Interior. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]