Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 6741 - 6760 of 32,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2009, 1:16 pm
On Tuesday morning, the Court will hear argument in Gross v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm by Ronald Mann
Apparently putting the nail in the coffin, Justice Scalia turned the discussion to the interests of the United States as creditor – parroting the argument of the Solicitor General that approving the debtor’s plan here would prejudice the United States when it appears as a creditor – because of its general inability to advance funds to bid in a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 4:35 pm
 The Court of Appeal affirms.The best case for the plaintiff was probably a Ninth Circuit case, applying California law, that held that the United States was liable for the sexual assault by an immigration officer on an applicant for asylum. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 7:03 am by Gritsforbreakfast
By Kerr's reckoning, their arguments were "essentially playing out the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 10:47 am by Kent Scheidegger
Fifty years ago today, the United States Supreme Court handed down the famous or infamous (depending on your point of view) decision in Miranda v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As stated by Chief Justice Wagner, our courts should provide “good justice for everyone, not perfect justice for a lucky few. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The justices did not add any cases to their merits docket, but they did issue a long-awaited ruling in Azar v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:47 am by zshapiro
Section One states: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am by Rosalind English
The Children’s Rights Alliance for England (CRAE) v Secretary of State for Justice and G4S Care and Justice Services (UK) Ltd  and Serco plc [2012] EWHC 8 (Admin) – read judgment Although certain restraining measures had been taken unlawfully against young people in secure training centres for a number of years, the court had no jurisdiction to grant an order that the victims of this activity be identified and advised of their rights. [read post]