Search for: "AT&T Operations Inc" Results 6761 - 6780 of 10,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
The thing is, he wasn’t very successful most of the time. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
The thing is, he wasn’t very successful most of the time. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Arizona lawsuit challenged a 2010 constitutional amendment to the Arizona Constitution that states”[t]he right to vote by secret ballot for employee representation is fundamental and shall be guaranteed where local, state or federal law permits or requires elections, designations or authorizations for employee representation. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:45 am by Steven Berk
So hats off to the DOJ, who recently filed suit against for-profit career college company ATI Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm by Eric Guttag
Basically, the patented technology facilitated the ability of the PC to operate like earlier “dumb terminals” in recognizing information sent by a mainframe connected to the PC. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:34 pm by WIMS
Shell also lost control of its Noble Discoverer drillship near Dutch Harbor, Alaska a few weeks ago, but never explained why it happened or why it won't happen again. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
[I don't understand how, if the term OpenCL identifies a programming language, it is not descriptive of a least a feature or function or characteristic of an API that implements that language. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:21 am by Christine E. Goepp
Even if it does owe the money, it can’t pay. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
  This course of action would be defensible, and draws some support from what the Court did in the nineties in Adarand Constructors Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:31 am by arester
But as she prepared to woo drug maker Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc. last year, she was worried. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:58 pm by Florian Mueller
If Samsung puts a new and non-infringing version of its operating software on a product named in the injunction order, the order doesn't apply just because the product still has the same name -- nor does it help Samsung to put the same old infringing operating software on a device with a new name.It still makes sense to name the (relatively) newest products at issue in a lawsuit as exemplary infringing devices. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2678 (2011), Buckman was also cited by the dissent (once again as a “cf. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:36 am
Carter owed a duty of care while operating his vehicle and he did not exercise care. [read post]