Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 6761 - 6780 of 7,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2013, 5:02 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
Despite the coordinating conjunction, the emphasis is largely (thus not exclusively) on “restorative (or ‘reparative’) justice” in transitional times, which is invariably examined in the light of retributive justice, whether or not the former in fact tends to facilitate, complement, ignore, trump or transcend the latter. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Family Voices members are paid staff within the Title V agency, providing information and support on health concerns to families around the state. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am by Peter Mahler
The upshot of the three cases — Centro Empresarial v America Movil, Arfa v Zamir, and Pappas v Tzolis — is that it depends not only on the particular language of the waiver or release but also on the sophistication of the complaining party and whether, at the time of the transaction, the complaining party had reason to distrust the other party such that it could not reasonably rely on the latter’s representations. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:22 pm by Richard Hornsby
With that said, it is true that I too have received phone calls from inmates using the chaplain’s office, only come those call have come from inmates in a county jail – never in a prison Paragraph 5: Among other topics discussed the undersigned was made aware that Robin Lunceford along with Maya Derkovic conspired with Robin Adams to possibly benefit by lying to the State about Casey Anthony. [read post]