Search for: "DOE DEFENDANT" Results 6761 - 6780 of 112,788
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Shorstein, Lasnetski & Gihon
However, there are times when the state does not know the amount of the restitution when the defendant pleads guilty or no contest. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Does the 12 month Window of 35 U.S.C. 315(b) Ever Reset? [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 4:27 am by SHG
” The issue here isn’t whether the Second Amendment exists, or whether it protects people’s right to hunt or defend themselves and their homes, but whether it’s also a bulwark against the government. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 12:10 pm by Carissa Byrne Hessick
Nor does it explain why this statement wasn’t clear evidence of Bancroft intending to impede and disrupt the orderly conduct of government business—the felony charge that prosecutors agreed to dismiss in return for Bancroft’s guilty plea. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 12:12 pm by Ray Beckerman
[T]he Court notes that Malibu's case is weak if all it can prove is that the Doe Defendants transmitted only part of all the BitT orrent pieces of the copyrighted work.Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm
The Supreme Court was emphatic that it would "undermine" the California ballot initiative process if the governor and attorney general can trump the voters by declining to defend such laws in the courts. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:59 am by Helen Klein Murillo, Benjamin Wittes
Attorneys’ Manual breaks down the three elements of an obstruction charge: “(1) there was a proceeding pending before a department or agency of the United States; (2) the defendant knew of or had a reasonably founded belief that the proceeding was pending; and (3) the defendant corruptly endeavored to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which the proceeding was pending. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
Just because Vringo has patent rights, held Birss J, it does not have the right to compel a defendant to enter into a licence. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:54 am
No Match Letter does not give right to fire.Aramark employs approximately 170,000 people in the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 2:34 pm by Shorstein & Lasnetski
For instance, the relevant factors under Florida law are: 1) there is significant evidence the defendant was impaired while driving, 2) there is evidence that the defendant recently used the drug, 3) there is not enough evidence that the defendant used some substance other than the drug which would explain his/her impairment, such as alcohol, and 4) the evidence does not show that the drug did not cause the impairment. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:48 am
Does a defendant have the right to know they're going to get hammered, before the gavel falls? [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm by Frankl & Kominsky Injury Lawyers
The defendant’s attorney conceded that the relevant statute does not discuss the burden, but rather the court’s gatekeeping function. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 8:13 pm
The record does not establish that plaintiff expressed its intention to discontinue the Queens County action in order to commence an action in Bronx County (cf. [read post]