Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2017, 6:29 pm
(Oct. 20, 2017) [cited below as Echeverria op.] [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:38 am
Following the conclusion of the consultation period, the Government has announced that it does not now plan to bring the reforms into force (Right to Enfranchise (RTE) Provisions – consultation: Summary of responses, CLG, March 2010). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:24 am
In other words, plaintiff doesn’t have to plead how the defendant violated federal regulations – a “general allegation” is enough. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Offering background for the sought agency collaboration, the document notes that the FBI requested assistance on December 20, 2011 in connection with FISA Court orders authorizing pen register/trap and trace (PRTT) collection in some instances and content collection in others. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:05 pm
” Id.at 20 (citing 21 U.S.C. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:47 am
” The court held that this instruction does not meet the standard for a litigation hold because it does not instruct employees to preserve all relevant paper and electronic documents and it does not “create a mechanism for collecting the preserved records so they can be searched by someone other than the employee. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 8:50 pm
Almost no-one on the left or the right, civil libertarians or ordinary citizens, will defend their rights. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
Gosnell, the Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, reversed another TPR finding. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:53 am
The fact that the amount of the fee is not set until the result is obtained does not change the fact that the fee is incurred based on hours or work performed for the client. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:40 am
[1] Waldron, C. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:07 pm
However, DOD does not plan to include the CMMC requirement in existing contracts via contract modifications. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
As mentioned above, this 20-page opinion does a wonderful job explaining why the federal standard of review of motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim should not be adopted by a state court. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:06 pm
Whether the petitioner and the defendant in the parallel proceeding are the same party; and 6. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am
Nordstrom Fraud Ruling As PrecedentialPrecedential No. 12: TTAB Again Says False Statement of First Use Date is not FraudPrecedential No. 2: TTAB Rules That, For a Multi-Class Registration, Fraud Must Be Considered Class-by-Class Genericness:Precedential No. 45: "TIRES TIRES TIRES" Generic for, or Merely Descriptive of, Tire Store ServicesPrecedential No. 13: TTAB Axes Fender Guitar Shapes, Finding Them Generic or Lacking Acquired DistinctivenessLack of Bona Fide Intent:Precedential No.… [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 8:53 am
The Debtor does not reside in the Property. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Granted )Docket: 11-338Issue(s): (1) Whether a citizen may bypass judicial review of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting rule under 33 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:48 am
” The court further reasoned that Rule 9510 does not target direct sources apart from its regulation of the indirect source as a whole. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:40 pm
â € Id., at Note 1. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center (Granted )Docket: 11-338Issue(s): (1) Whether a citizen may bypass judicial review of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting rule under 33 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:38 am
The laws which were drafted in those times have to be interpreted in consonance with the present times and technology.While discussing the relevant provisions of law, the Court observed that;20. [read post]
