Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 6761 - 6780 of 8,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2010, 10:51 am
The rights and the duties of the Standing Committee, except as provided in the Constitution and Canons of the General Convention, may be prescribed by the Canons of the respective Dioceses.ARTICLE V. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:34 am
 The ATE policy and GWM guarantee were made in the full knowledge of the existence of the other and there was no doubt that the primary liability to the miners lay with Templeton. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 7:06 am by Marin
Wall Street 2 is a sequel  both because its title includes “2” and it continues the NYC plotline of the original (though the writing has worsened).The quibbling over spinoff v. sequel reminds me of one of those textbook trust and estate cases where the lawyer thoughtlessly inserts the words “now living” and inadvertently cuts a future-born child out of the will. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 6:06 am by Tessa Shepperson
As Lord Justice Sedley rightly said “legislation like this is or ought to be written for lay people“. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
 Inside Higher Ed today reports that the school is invoking the Supreme Court's 1979 decision in NLRB v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
(See Appendix XXI to the 1895 Journal, which lays out the agreed-upon text of the proposed new Article I, plus a few changes to Article V.) [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
  And the most successful lawyers on the right side of the "v" are the ones who adopt new ideas, new technologies and new ways of looking at the world, and their cases. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Hill
But the remedy for the state lay not in individual trusts taking decisions such as that in respect of B’s case, but in primary legislation which allowed that costs of treatment to be recovered from the insurers by the NHS (for example Part 3 of the Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) Act 2003). [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:39 pm by David Lat
But we haven’t seen a complaint this juicy since Allgood v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 7:00 pm by Chris Semerjian
The most famous decision was issued by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2009: Plourde v. [read post]