Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 6761 - 6780 of 7,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Willard also argued, quoting O’Connor v Coccadotts (47 Misc 3d 331 [Sup Ct, Albany County 2015]), that a bond would be entirely inappropriate without “‘proof persuasively demonstrating a need for such relief. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 1:31 am by tekEditor
[IWE] Why Lisp macros are cool, a Perl perspective Ben Tilly iwe@warhead.org.uk Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:40:44 -0700 MJD is one of the well-known Perl hackers. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
AIPLA Peter Sullivan of Foley Hoag filed the AIPLA brief. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 11:03 pm by centerforartlaw
Reprinted with permission from the NYS Bar Association, this article first appeared in the EASL Journal, 2023, vol. 34, no. 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm by Michael O'Brien
  The first word on the matter was Judge Neal Peters McCurn in Indium Corp. of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade and Peter Preston discuss these developments in The Guardian. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
: (IPEG),More on the implementation of the London Agreement and patent cost reduction in Europe: (Patent Baristas),ECJ rules that EU legislative obligations cannot be enforced in any Member State if that legislation has not been published in the Official Journal in the language of that Member State (Case C-161/06  OlomoucSkoma-Lux sro v Celni reditelstvi Olumouc): (IPKat),EPO fighting complex appl [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm by familoo
 A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said :   (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]