Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 7,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
True, the Court does not hear full oral arguments between the end of June and the beginning of October (except in extraordinary circumstances, as when it held a reargument in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:51 pm
Justice Thomas issues them without any concern. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
Concurring in Caetano v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 6:26 am
In Lavan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm
After nearly two hours of debate Wednesday in Fulton v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
The Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 11:12 am
In Weiner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Justice Alito then turned to the famous case of Ricci v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:14 pm
On Tuesday, in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 2:01 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 4:02 pm
Marques v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 5th District.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Mandatory minimum -- No error in including mandatory minimum sentence in written sentence for offense of robbery with firearm, although mandatory minimum sentence was not orally pronounced -- Court recedes from prior decision in which it held that oral pronouncement of sentence controls in this contextANDRE ISAIAH DUNBAR, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 4:47 pm
In the seminal case of Taylor, the Supreme Court held that the ACCA required a federal definition for generic predicate offenses, such as – in that case – “burglary. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 10:33 am
Under United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:17 pm
The defendant being an amateur blogger rather than a professional journalist (the court held that the journalistic nature of the blog was what mattered, not the status of the person who wrote it). d. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:28 am
In Marlow v. [read post]
