Search for: "United States v. Place"
Results 6761 - 6780
of 23,712
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 8:19 am
Perhaps most famously, following Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in February 2016, the court issued an equally divided decision in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
” Op. at 19, quoting United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:29 pm
See United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:00 am
” Op. at 19, quoting United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:25 am
(There are more than 4,000,000 miles of public roads in the United States.) [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Rev. __ (forthcoming), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3071000), I argue that the United States is doing just that with respect to computer-implemented business methods. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am
Under the state secrets doctrine, the appeals court began, “the United States may prevent the disclosure of information in a judicial proceeding if ‘there is a reasonable danger’ that such disclosure ‘will expose military matters which, in the interest of national security, should not be divulged. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
”) (quot- ing United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
No one thought these states were no longer in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:39 pm
I haven't blogged recently about the Ninth Circuit's blockbuster computer search and seizure decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am
A case, TEKsystems, Inc. v Hammernick et al, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota could signify a new trend in unlawful competition litigation in South Africa. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:55 am
In Universal Cable Productions LLC, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:17 am
A case, TEKsystems, Inc. v Hammernick et al, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota could signify a new trend in unlawful competition litigation in South Africa. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:01 pm
The damages and penalties against Tuomey totaled $237,454,195 as decided in United States ex rel. [read post]
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm
Just how far does the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution go to protect against a warrantless search of an apartment? [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
Plains Pipeline, L.P. et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:07 pm
On January 10, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
