Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 661 - 680 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
Weber Company neglects to defend its mark (Class 46)   Serbia Balkan anti-counterfeiting - Serbia and Macedonia customs authorities border closures (RelatIP)   South Africa Debate about abandonment of the Springbok, South Africa's traditional rugby emblem (Afro-IP) Spain Geographic indications v trade marks: Supreme Court confirms refusal of Spanish trade mark application for VINO DE LA TIERRA ARRIBES DEL DUERO (translation: wine from the land of Aribbes del Duero)… [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Thin, nonsensical, and desperate, it makes the defence in The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd seem meritorious by comparison, which, as readers of this blog will know, it was anything but. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am by Tobias Thienel
London Borough of Enfield [2001] 2 AC 550, per Lord Browne-Wilkinson; this terminology was misunderstood by the ECtHR in Osman v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On the other there is the duty of public authorities to act compatibly with individuals’ Convention rights – in this case the Article 8 right to respect for private and family life, which the Court of Human Rights and Supreme Court have recognised as including a degree of protection for an individual’s reputation (see In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1). [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:41 am by Ron Coleman
This undoubtedly seemed like a good way to avoid a lot of “business,” because the premise of this classic conundrum is that the exclusive distributor has apparently aced the manufacturer out of goodwill by using the manufacturer’s own mark in commerce before (usually way before) the manufacturer has (if it indeed ever has at all). [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:21 am by @ErikJHeels
(Avon, MA) Acs Development Corporation (Boston, MA) Acton Burgerdrome Limited (Acton, MA) Acupuncture Wellness Corp. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In Ferguson v Associated Newspapers Ltd (unreported) Gray J held that “calculated” meant “more probable than not” rather than “something which is a possibility”. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm by Marx Sterbcow
(“Danberry”) created Defendant Integrity Title Agency of Ohio & Michigan, Ltd (“Integrity”). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
In Mosley at para 229 Eady J directed himself to take into account awards in defamation cases, and referred also to Gleaner Company Ltd v Abrahams [2004] 1 AC 628. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:36 am by Kelly
(Class 46) Can counterfeiting be justified: the case of the Koreas (IPKat) Argentina SUAVE has secondary meaning, but not very much of it, says Argentine Court (IP tango) Canada What is mine is not yours and what is yours is in fact mine: Copyright, consumers and first sale (IP Osgoode) Curiouser & curiouser @ Copyright Board’s AC hearings (Excess Copyright) Access Copyright interim tariff coming for Christmas? [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:47 pm by INFORRM
In Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) Tugendhat J referred to the judgment of the House of Lords in Sim v Stretch ([1936] 2 All ER 1237) and to the judgment of Sharp J in Ecclestone v Telegraph Media Group Ltd ([2009] EWHC 2779 (QB)) and held that, “whatever definition of ‘defamatory’ is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]
6 May 2021, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
Warby LJ made it clear that, contrary to arguments put forward by counsel for Mr Corbyn, the Supreme Court decision in Joseph v Spiller [2011] AC 852 was relevant to this second condition of the honest opinion defence, and not to the first condition set out in section 3(2) of the 2013 Act [23]. [read post]