Search for: "Adam B."
Results 661 - 680
of 3,380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Adam Meier, No. 19-417 (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s (SSCI’s) groundbreaking study on the CIA’s use of enhanced interrogation techniques (EITs) has been receiving attention again due to the release of the movie “The Report. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
In 2009, nearly a decade before the #MeToo movement, Judge Samuel B. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
Adam Schiff. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
B. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
” Law professor and historian Jed Shugerman, who unlike Turley favored impeachment on the substantive charges in Article I, has agreed, suggesting that Trump should not be impeached for obstruction because impeachment should be a last resort and “[b]y definition, the House impeaching for unlitigated subpoenas is no last resort. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
Adams Co. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 1:14 pm
Class members are: Stephen Adams, Chambliss Bahner & Stophel, Chattanooga A.J. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 11:09 am
Our colleague Adam S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 8:45 am
Engel; Carolyn B. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:50 pm
The substantive issue on appeal in Thryv was the PTO’s interpretation of the time bar in § 315(b). [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:10 am
Expected at oral arguments: Adam Charnes (Kilpatrick Townsend) is representing the petitioner patent-challenger Thryv. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:44 am
“Deputy Tyrone, I’ve got two perps in Interrogation B that I need you to question. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 3:55 am
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that this “follows a petition filed last month about a similar subpoena from Manhattan prosecutors”; “[b]oth cases are moving fast, and the court could announce as soon as Dec. 13 whether the justices will hear them. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
R v Adams (Northern Ireland), heard 19 November 2019. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am
In my view, the ideal family law litigant is one who is motivated by their own rational self-interest, to paraphrase Adam Smith, not one embroiled in conflict so venomous that the battle becomes more important than the outcome. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:05 am
§ 621.05; see also In re Adams, 389 B.R. 762 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:05 am
§ 621.05; see also In re Adams, 389 B.R. 762 (Bankr. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:51 am
Authors’ note: This article is developed out of prior writing on Lawfare, including our own work and a series of deposition summaries written by Lawfare editors and contributors Charlotte Butash, Kelsey Clinton, Mikhaila Fogel, Vishnu Kannan, Patrick McDonnell, Jacob Schulz, Chinmayi Sharma Masha Simonova, Lucia Radder and Samantha Fry and edited by us. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that “[t]he court’s stay was in one sense routine, maintaining the status quo while the court decides whether to hear Mr. [read post]
