Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 661 - 680
of 7,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/2/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v… [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
Canada On 6 February 2023, Smith J dismissed the defendant’s application to dismiss the plaintiff’s claim under an anti-SLAPP provision in the case of Kirkland v Nagy et al, 2023 ONSC 871. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 9:18 am
The Competition Law Association will be hosting The Hon Mr Justice Marcus Smith, who will speak about the relationship between competition and IP law on March 1 at Matrix Chambers in London. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 7:25 am
Smith’s outline contains exhibit numbers rather than exhibit names as the exhibi [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
The Competition Law Association will be hosting The Hon Mr Justice Marcus Smith, who will speak about the relationship between competition and IP law on March 1 at Matrix Chambers in London. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 9:16 pm
That product listing submission itself should include: the facility registration number for the facility in which the cosmetic is manufactured; information about the responsible person for the cosmetic, including contact information; the applicable cosmetic category or categories for the product and a list of ingredients in the product. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
“Unfortunately, this is yet another example of the NFL’s betrayal of its players once we are no longer on the field and making them money,” said Eric Smith, one of ten named plaintiffs in the lawsuit and a former safety who played for seven seasons in the NFL. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:59 am
Reed Smith will continue to follow developments of the No Surprises Act, its implementing regulations, and the dispute resolution and court processes around application of both. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:32 am
Eric Dunn, The Case Against Rental Application Fees, 30(1) Geo. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
Smith, 192 N.C. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Even worse, the DMA will not displace the application of EU antitrust law, but merely add to its burdens. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
Bolden, but the other Reed Smith attorneys as well,’ the new filing reads. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am
Should the Court determine issues 1 and/or 2 above on a summary judgment and/or strike-out application? [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
Per Carr J in Parsa v DS Smith Plc [2019] Costs LR 331 at [35] in respect of an application in respect of fixed following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer: “The substantive litigation had ended; the claim had settled in relation to all bar costs and had been stayed by the automatic operation of CPR 36.14 . [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:29 am
Smith’s case has long been a focus for some of us. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Smith, 263 A.3d 555 (Pa. 2021), the plaintiffs bar was successful in litigating the issue of proper venue in internet defamation cases and convinced the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to rule that internet-based defamation claims can be filed anywhere that the defamatory statements were viewed and understood as defamatory. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414, 420 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:51 pm
Misbranding A central tenet of FDA’s application of the FDCA is that companies are prohibited from “promoting” unapproved products and unapproved uses of approved products. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]