Search for: "Board of Education v. County Board of Education"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm
Educators v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT January 8, 2008 Campbell County School Dist. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE WYOMING SUPREME COURT January 8, 2008 Campbell County School Dist. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”* Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 May 2016, 4:00 am
” In that action the Appellate Division said that the termination of the employee, a NYCTA bus driver for 15 years, with an unblemished record of employment and who had consistently received positive performance evaluations, and had never been disciplined as the sanction “for a single, alleged transgression is grossly excessive and shocks our sense of fairness,” citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division indicated that its review of the matter was limited to whether DMV's determination was arbitrary and capricious, irrational, affected by an error of law or an abuse of discretion and, citing Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, noted that "An action may be said to be arbitrary if it lacks basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Supreme Court dismissed her petition, which ruling was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division.Citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division indicated that its review of the matter was limited to whether DMV's determination was arbitrary and capricious, irrational, affected by an error of law or an abuse of discretion and, citing Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, noted that "An action may be said to be arbitrary if it lacks basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 12:00 am
Jefferson County Board of Education, 551 U.S. 701 (2007). [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:17 am
Haaland (Indian Gaming Regulatory Act) Meeks v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
"Addressing the penalty imposed on the employee by the Commissioner, termination, the Appellate Division applied the so-called "Pell Doctrine," Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:28 am
Canestraro initially filed a Notice of Claim for reinstatement and damages but Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dismissed his Article 78 petition on the grounds that the Commissioner of Education had primary jurisdiction over the dispute [Canestraro v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 8:58 am
Board of Education ruling... [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
Alameda County Super. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:27 am
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, 772 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 2000); Greenwald v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 7:45 am
Jefferson County Board of Education. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
In Davenport v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:46 am
We see that again in this case that alleges a Rockland County school district was allegedly in violation of the Establishment Clause over its relationship with Hasidic Jews.The case is Montesa v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:00 am
§2510 provides, in pertinent part, "Whenever a board of education abolishes a position under this chapter, the services of the teacher having the least seniority in the system within the tenure of the position abolished shall be discontinued. [read post]
