Search for: "Brady v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
May 14, 2010)(O'Neill) (civil forfeiture case, truck driver failed to show entitlement to money hidden in truck and unclaimed byowner)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00158-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court [pdf]View E-Briefs in No. 08-0465 THE… [read post]
12 May 2016, 5:07 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
According to a recent news feature from The Hill, the way which the United States Social Security Administration (SSA) is choosing to help, pursuant to the policy directives of the presidential administration, is to report the identities of anyone who is receiving disability benefits and has a mental health condition to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), so that they can include these names in the instant Brady check performed whenever the ownership of a gun is… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-8278, a habeas case from the Third Circuit involving claims of error under Brady, Batson, and Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) (codifying the forfeiture-by-wrongdoing exception to the hearsay rules). [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:52 pm by cdw
United States and that he is actually innocent of capital murder. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am by John Elwood
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:13 am by Steve Hall
The landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm by cdw
” [via LexisOne] FAVORABLE TO THE PROSECUTION OR EXECUTIONER United States v. [read post]