Search for: "Branch v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 4,813
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm by Kevin Johnson
The arguments The United States contends that, because the statute is ambiguous and the BIA’s interpretation is reasonable, that interpretation is entitled to deference under Chevron U.S.A, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:12 pm by Mark Edwards
United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), is an fascinating decision. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:06 pm by Eva Arevuo
  It is not by accident that after World War II, nearly every democratic country in the world began to follow the lead of the United States in assigning to judges the role of policing the outer bounds of government’s legitimate authority. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:52 am by Gene Quinn
United States Supreme Court I am just about out of ways to creatively announce that the United States Supreme Court has once again had a decision issue day come and go without issuing a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:18 am by Amy Howe
United States, “which certainly seems possible based on the oral argument, it will cap off a terrible decade for the Executive Branch in foreign relations cases before the Supreme Court. [read post]
In footage shot in 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hears argument in Jewel, and an attorney from the Department of Justice tries to convince a skeptical court that it should simply decide not to decide the case, leaving it to the other branches of government. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States (that’s Walter Nixon, not Richard), which explained why it would be in appropriate to allow other branches to define or interfere with the exercise of the legislative branch’s checks on the judiciary. [read post]