Search for: "California v. Superior Court"
Results 661 - 680
of 5,746
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2019, 3:27 pm
I was surprised to see a case today captioned "People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal. 4th 969, 986. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:18 am
Superior Court, S166350, is set for argument on November 8 at 9:00 a.m. in San Francisco. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:59 am
Although the decision isn’t binding on the Shutterstock lawsuit, in a case in Orange County Superior (Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:49 am
On July 12, 2010, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in Clayworth v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 10:05 am
Superior Court, the court declared that employers must meet the three-prong ABC test to overcome the presumption of employment status. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Superior Court (2020) 9 Cal.5th 642, 651 (Abbott Labs).) [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:03 pm
At long last, the California Supreme Court has set Brinker v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:15 am
Superior Court. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
No sale, said the California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:20 am
Under the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Discover Bank v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:10 am
In Fresno, California, a Superior court judge has issued a tentative ruling in Diocese of San Joaquin v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
Superior Court (Liberty Mutual), Case No. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:38 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:25 pm
Superior Court applied retroactively. [read post]
27 May 2010, 1:08 pm
In Legacy Vulcan Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:48 am
Superior Court (Atlantic Richfield).The case is a public nuisance action related to lead paint. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
A California class action lawsuit (Brantley v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:57 am
The California Court of Appeal in Meda v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 12:51 pm
The California Supreme Court held long ago -- like, a year ago -- that the vexatious litigant statute doesn't apply to defendants who file an appeal when they've been sued (and lost) as a defendant.Now, a year later, the Court revises and reposts its opinion to revise the counsel listing page. [read post]
