Search for: "Capital Express, Inc" Results 661 - 680 of 1,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 11:57 pm by Nietzer
Under the settlement, Capital One would contribute $73 million to the $75 million settlement fund, Leading Edge Recovery Solutions LLC would contribute $996,205.71, Capital Management Systems LP would contribute $24,220.08 and AllianceOne Receivables Management Inc. would contribute $1,434,672.95. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 5:39 am by Daniel Gwertzman
On June 27, 2014, Gana LLP filed a statement of claim against JHS Capital Advisors, LLC, formerly known as Pointe Capital Inc, on behalf of an Arkansas couple. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:59 pm by Michael
The California-based company was part of the Tamiz v Google Inc 2013 case in England and Wales. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
  Family Dollar Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:09 am by Nicholas Gebelt
  See In re Lake States Commodities, Inc., 272 B.R. 233, 242 (Bankr. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:03 am by Kevin LaCroix
John Fund, No. 13-317, much of the discussion focused on the practical realities of securities litigation, including (i) the procedures available to defendants to rebut the presumption of classwide reliance established in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:30 am by Brian Garmo
Google has expressed concern about complying with this ruling and about the limiting effect on the dissemination of information. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:06 am by Davidson Stephanie
We became interested in recent advance in parsing technology, called PEG (Parsing Expression Grammar). [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 10:06 am by Davidson Stephanie
We became interested in recent advance in parsing technology, called PEG (Parsing Expression Grammar). [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Hobby Lobby, Inc., 723 F. 3d 1114 (10th Cir., 2013) provides one of the most interesting applications of the insights we try to draw in the book. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
§157(b)(5), that statute is not jurisdictional; and (ii) Pierce’s expressions of consent to the bankruptcy court determination of the Pierce Proof of Claim waived his objection to such determination based on §157(b)(5). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
The petitioners in the patent-infringement case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]