Search for: "Cohen v. California"
Results 661 - 680
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
In such cases, the Supreme Court has made clear in Washington v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey, Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law Federal Circuit holds refusal to register a political message for T-shirts violates the First Amendment, but fails to acknowledge that these types of registrations can chill expression On February 24, 2022, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held in the case In re Elster that Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act was an unconstitutional regulation of expression as applied to an applicant who attempted to register the… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
(For purposes of the discussion, the participants really didn’t draw many distinctions between public and private universities, since most prominent private universities try to hold themselves—sometimes, as in California, because state law requires them to do so—to the same First Amendment standards that bind public institutions. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 12:06 pm
Clear coverage: Transunion v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:33 am
I also think the Supreme Court was right in Cohen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 8:30 am
And, she writes, there have been such omissions, pointing, for instance to Harper v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 1:51 pm
See Cohen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
This was true in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 9:01 pm
” Critics assert, in particular, that the president seems oblivious to a 1993 Supreme Court ruling, Nixon v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
The statute states that a compensation arrangement shall not include: (i) payments made for the rental or lease of office space, if (A) there is a written agreement, signed by the parties, for the rental or lease of the space, which agreement specifies the space covered by the agreement and dedicated for the use of the lessee, provides for a term of rental or lease of at least one year, provides for a payment on a… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court observed in the famous New York Times v. [read post]
