Search for: "Does 1 Through 35"
Results 661 - 680
of 4,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2008, 3:01 am
Everything really fell on the actors to make much with little, and they came through splendidly. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 9:06 am
Patent Law Jobs — One way to track potential law jobs is through an RSS link. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Rev. 1-41 (2011).Criddle, Evan J. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
Children were slipping through the cracks. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Of the 51 titles, the following titles have been enacted into positive (statutory) law: 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 23, 28, 31, 32, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 44, 46, 49, and 51. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am
§ 319 (permitting “[a] party dissatisfied with the final written decision [to] appeal the decision pursuant to sections 141 through 144”); 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
With its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant submitted the following document:D23 Experimental report (8 pages)The last two pages of the statement of grounds of appeal are headed "Annex 1" and show a calculation of the number of compounds covered by formula Ia in claim 1.VI. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
Hayes describes a system in which contact to a communications system is maintained through a process of “registration. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:03 am
” The Federal Circuit considered claims 1-3: 1. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
The top tax rate will increase to 39.6% from 35%. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:56 pm
It also found claim 79 of the ’357 patent and claim 1 of the ’030 patent invalid based on obviousness. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Buck & Doe Run Valley Farms, LLC, 2008 WL 3846318 (Del. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 8:16 am
Patent Application Nos. 12/645,037 and 16/279,095 as obvious under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:20 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
However, through s. 676(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, Parliament limits Crown appeals against acquittals in proceedings by indictment to “question[s] of law alone. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:03 pm
., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), which established that an inquiry into commercial success, failure of others, and long-felt but unmet need is an important protection against hindsight bias in the obviousness analysis. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 10:08 am
The fact that the inventors are the same or that there is common ownership does not prevent the earlier application from being counted as prior art.(1, 2) When considering how to best protect add-on enhancements to an existing patent application, be mindful that the benefit of preserving the original priority date for claims supported in the original disclosure may not be worth the risk of having the parent application count against you for prior art. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:27 am
This is part 1 of a two-part post on human trafficking as a gendered phenomenon. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
Supp. 3d at 102 n.1. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 7:23 am
If I understand their argument correctly, it runs something like this:1. [read post]
