Search for: "Does 1-25"
Results 661 - 680
of 18,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2011, 10:03 am
Perfect 10 is seeking a total of $25 million in damages.3: IP-Address Is Not a Person, BitTorrent Case Judge SaysFinally today, a judge denied a subpoena request made by Canadian adult content company VPR Internationale preventing them from getting information from ISPs as part of their lawsuit against over 1,000 “Doe” defendants they accuse of illegally sharing their content online. [read post]
5 Mar 2022, 6:35 pm
Final Written De cision, at *25 [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:40 pm
typ=SET&i=ADV&RESULTSET=1&DOC_TITLE=Final+description+and+assessment&DOC_SUBTYPE=%22OUTCOME+OF+PROCEEDINGS%22&DOC_LANCD=EN&ROWSPP=25&NRROWS=500&ORDERBY=DOC_DATE+DESCShare | [read post]
1 Nov 2006, 10:54 am
Proc. 25(d).2. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:51 am
" [para 25]Among other things, the CJEU observed that "the fact that Directive 2004/48 does not entail an obligation on the Member States to provide for ‘punitive’ damages cannot be interpreted as a prohibition on introducing such a measure. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Larcker, 2008, The power of the pen and executive compensation, Journal of Financial Economics 88, 1-25. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:04 pm
Table 1: An Illustrative Risk-Informed Choice Set Option Prob Hazard Benefits Costs Net Benefits A 0.1 -$100 $10 $55 -45 B 0.3 -$80 $24 $40 -16 C 0.5 -$60 $30 $25 5 D 0.7 -$40 $28 $10 18 To see how this is so, consider a highly simplified and hypothetical choice scenario reflected in the table above. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:30 pm
And, CDC does a Podcast: [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
.): 1 Complaint An excerpt: 1. [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:16 pm
In the last 25 years, the districts have been at the heart of four earlier racial gerrymandering cases at the court. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am
In the absence of a test method in the patent for determining the anti-adherence of a material, the skilled person is unable to establish, even qualitatively, suitable materials from the extensive group of materials listed in claim 1 which will meet the claimed anti-adherence.1.4 Still further, claim 1 does not limit the amount of anti-adherent material to be included in the composition such that this can range from a fraction of 1% to approaching 100%, this… [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am
In the absence of a test method in the patent for determining the anti-adherence of a material, the skilled person is unable to establish, even qualitatively, suitable materials from the extensive group of materials listed in claim 1 which will meet the claimed anti-adherence.1.4 Still further, claim 1 does not limit the amount of anti-adherent material to be included in the composition such that this can range from a fraction of 1% to approaching 100%, this… [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:10 pm
(1) “greater granularity of its data” and (2) “its wider variance of outcomes. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:10 pm
(1) “greater granularity of its data” and (2) “its wider variance of outcomes. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:51 am
So surviving FC #1 gets 25% of the estate, the surviving child of FC #2 gets 25% of the estate, the four surviving grandchildren of FC #3 each get 6.25% of the estate, and the surviving great-grandchild of FC #4 gets 25% of the estate.The trial court, by the way, thought that only the FCs and children of FCs got to share. [read post]
District Court Shuts Down Defense Tactic And Finds That Offer Of Judgment Does Not Moot Class Claims
15 Jun 2013, 11:20 am
Id. at 1-2. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
Put differently, does the employee’s awareness of the defect eliminate the employer’s duty to maintain a safe workplace? [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 11:15 am
Does an employer who genuinely believes that its workers are independent contractors and tells them that they are contractors and not employees, only to later find out that it was wrong, violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act)? [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
On 25 July 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Teva & Sandoz v Astellas[1] concerning the validity of Astellas’ patent to mirabegron for use in the treatment of overactive bladder (“OAB”). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
They hope to comply with the court order before October 1, 2011. [read post]
