Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 661 - 680
of 12,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
Administrative Law Prof Blog Oct 29 Good class discussion Oct 22 Types of regulatory strategies, and does the third type work? [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:47 am
On January 27, 1967, Astronauts Gus Grissom, Edward White and Roger Chafee died in the Apollo 1 spacecraft fire. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:39 am
Oakland Board of Education (083273) Is an employee alleging discrimination for failure to accommodate a disability, pursuant to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49, required to show an adverse employment action; and is this employee’s claim barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, N.J.S.A. 34:15-1 to -146? [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:50 am
9-1-1. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
[1] 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 1:23 pm
Mason Dixon had McCain ahead in Florida by 1, 46-45. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Smalls, a summary order decided on July 27. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Overview As a preliminary matter, any company contemplating a share repurchase should consider the limitations set forth within the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, passed into law on March 27, 2020; the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, passed into law on December 27, 2020; and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, passed into law on March 11, 2021 (collectively, Acts). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:33 pm
The only precedent does not bode well for a quick process. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 3:39 am
Since in the amended claim 1 the protection conferred by claim 1 as granted has been extended, the amendment is not allowable under Article 123(3) EPC.27. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
The professors' brief (previous post) has the same focus, and does a superb job. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:53 am
In a March 27, 2023 post found here, we wrote about the Second District Court of Appeal’s (Div. 1) decision concerning the Water Code section 13389 CEQA exemption for Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) issuance of waste discharge permits, formerly published as Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Defendants note that RIME’s signature does not appear·anywhere on the “Vandal Eyes”mural. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
However, developers should note that the assessment does not include (1) any assumptions about technology or (2) any flow field effects from energy extraction. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 4:49 am
Practically speaking, three primary scenarios will arise:1. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:52 am
These claims are framed under sections 27(1), 27(2), and 27(2.3) of Canada’s Copyright Act respectively. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
On May 27, 2016, Geico Marine sent Shackleford an email confirming that it had removed the Port Risk Ashore restriction. [read post]
