Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 661 - 680
of 9,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Will Baude points out that the petition's indecipherable nature may be due to inadequate supervision by the attorney on the case.Both Blackman and Baude highlight the petition's mysterious question presented:“Does the US Constitution, in legal decisions based on 35 USC §§ 101/102/103/112, • require instantly avoiding the inevitable legal errors in construing incomplete and vague classical claim constructions – especially for… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:43 am
What does this mean for you? [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:11 am
The bottom line in Ex parte Barber:The Examiner did not err in rejecting claims 1, 3-7, 9-21, 23-41, 63-68, 70, and 71 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 11:43 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:10 am
And according to Fox News, the data demonstrate a 35 percent uptick in sexual assaults reported, compared to last quarter’s reporting, which spanned April 1 through June 30. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 8:10 am
And according to Fox News, the data demonstrate a 35 percent uptick in sexual assaults reported, compared to last quarter’s reporting, which spanned April 1 through June 30. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
The administration should be given credit for recognizing how our high corporate tax rate is undermining U.S. competitiveness, but their proposed 28 percent rate does not move the charts in terms of improved competitiveness. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:07 am
How does it feel?) [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:31 am
Yet he does not seem to be famous enough to get his name registered as an EU trade mark. [read post]
14 May 2010, 7:52 am
" Essentially, the new 35 U.S.C. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:45 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966) and supplemented in KSR. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
[para 35]. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:29 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada has specifically stated that this alone does not give rise to liability. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:23 am
Trademark Act §1(a), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:58 pm
Ward 1: Daniel La Spata (D) Ward 2: Brian Hopkins (D) Ward 25: Byron Sigcho-Lopez (D) Ward 32: Scott Waguespack (D) Ward 35: Carlos Ramirez-Rosa (D) Ward 36: Gilbert Villegas (D) Ward 40: Andre Vasquez, Jr. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 3:12 pm
CBM2012-00003, 2012 WL 9494791, at*1 (P.T.A.B. [read post]
22 Apr 2017, 4:27 pm
This court affirmed the holding,and the time to petition for a writ of certiorari has passed.Moreover, Power Integrations does not dispute that theseobviousness grounds could have been raised in the civilaction in which it failed to meet its burden.While it is true that in Power Integrations this courtvacated and remanded for additional proceedings, wecannot agree with Power Integrations that this rendersthe decision not “final” for [35 USC] § 317(b) purposes. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:39 am
Thus, Brogné does not teach away from modifying the message even after a recipient has accessed the message.Separately, there was no argument as to some claims:Claims 4-6 depend from independent claim 1, but were rejected under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:07 am
The TTAB recently decided the appeals from three Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusals summarized below. [read post]
