Search for: "Evans v. Backes" Results 661 - 680 of 852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 4:17 am by admin
Second, the lack of a precedential holding on standing outside the Second Circuit is significant because the utilities had sought to pare back the Supreme Court’s holding on that issue in Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 12:59 pm
The Court distinguished its decision in Bazemore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:11 am by Steven Ballard
 Only four of the court's 25 active members publicly backed rehearing the case before an 11-judge panel. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/Q6l41Q (Morrison Foerster) The Convergence of Big Data and Social Media – http://bit.ly/LG54W5 (Sean Gelles) Vendor Views Industry Landscape 17a-4 llc’s DataParser™ Supports Enhancements to Bloomberg® Feed – http://bit.ly/Ld3B5e (PR Web) AccessData to License Software Connectors – http://bit.ly/LBFD8l (Evan Koblentz) Allen J. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Back in March, they granted the company’s request for a stay, without recorded dissent. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Evan Harris also condemned these changes as “all “press release” and no “press regulation,” and questioned why IPSO did not consult the public over these changes “and instead negotiated in secret with a secretive industry body. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The decision has thrown the spotlight back onto the CPS’s decision against charging Mirror Group journalists with phone hacking. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The paper was ordered to publish a critical adjudication no further back than page five. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 3:15 pm by Ilya Somin
As far back as 1973, Justice William Rehnquist's dissent in Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the over-the-air broadcasters in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
If that issue sounds familiar, it’s because the court granted review on one of those cases (Hyatt) a few terms back, but couldn’t resolve the issue because the court was equally divided. [read post]