Search for: "Frye"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 6:36 am
The trial court sustained the Frye challenge and precluded the plaintiffs from adducing the any-exposure opinion. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:19 am
The first step was to formulate the search terms for which we are using Daubert, Kumho, Frye and 702. [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
Maddox’s be stricken as “novel” scientific evidence in violation of the Frye line of cases: [T]he defendants sought to exclude general causation testimony that the chrysotile asbestos in friction products causes mesothelioma, since chrysotile is the least potent form of asbestos; the asbestos contained in friction products is embedded in resin; and published, peer-reviewed epidemiological studies concerning the experience of brake workers with asbestos disease have… [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:46 am
Frye bandwagon, claiming that his attorney never told him about a plea offer which would have given him ten years in prison, rather than the life without parole that he got. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:51 pm
Frye, 566 U. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:40 am
If folks enjoy books like A Wrinkle In Time, and Harry Potter, they will love Liberty Frye and the Witches of Hessen by J.L. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:23 am
The prosecution's expert witness at the Frye hearing conclusively opined that according to FBI figures, there are 900,000 arrests per year which, over a 23-year period add up to 20 million. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:52 pm
May 23, 2012)(slip op.) regarding asbestos-related products liability expert issues under a Frye analysis. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:43 am
Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399 (2012) and Lafler v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am
this time in the specific context of Grady/Frye ? [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am
Frye, but haven’t mentioned the companion case, Lafler v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:28 pm
In Betz, the Superior Court reversed an Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas judge’s Frye ruling, in an asbestos mesothelioma case, that an expert witness’s opinion that each exposure had been a “substantial contributing factor” was both novel and not generally accepted. [read post]
21 May 2012, 7:49 pm
To read more about the oral arguments in the companion cases of Frye and Lafler, click here. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
The Court held that the expert evidence presented satisfied the scientific reliability test set forth in Frye v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 5:08 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:53 pm
Frye, No. 10-444. [read post]
13 May 2012, 7:41 am
Frye the Court took belated note of this fact, recognizing a right to counsel in plea bargaining in part because “longer sentences exist on the books largely for bargaining purposes. [read post]
4 May 2012, 1:25 pm
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:38 am
” But at least in criminal law and procedure, the field I know best, Lafler and Frye seem like par for the course; the idea that good scholars are irrelevant to courts and and legal doctrine struck me as mistaken. [read post]
