Search for: "Grand Jury Matter, in Re" Results 661 - 680 of 1,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by KC Johnson
We’re shutting down the program and you’re all gone. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
 Lane testified before a federal grand jury and — pursuant to a subpoena – he testified at Schmitz’s two federal criminal trials for mail fraud and fraud involving a program receiving federal funds. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:57 am by Gritsforbreakfast
When a defendant is held in jail, state law requires that cases be presented to a grand jury for indictment within 90 days. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:43 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Assuming that the contempt charge gets through the House (and that’s a huge assumption), the matter would then move to a grand jury. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:20 pm
Although the government cites In re Sealed Case, 199 F.3d 522, 526 (D.C.Cir.2000), for the proposition that “[u]nlike typical judicial proceedings, grand jury proceedings and related matters operate under a strong presumption of secrecy,” the present matter is not really about grand jury secrecy. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In view of the foregoing, the indictment was dismissed with leave to re-present to a New York County Grand Jury, to the extent that the People can establish jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for re-presentation before a Bronx County Grand Jury. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by Ken White
So, for instance, a criminal defendant can testify before the grand jury or at a preliminary hearing but refuse to testify at trial. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am by Ken White
The only question is whether the Kaleys are constitutionally entitled to a judicial re-determination of the conclusion the grand jury already reached: that probable cause supports this criminal prosecution (or alternatively put, that the prosecution is not "baseless," as the Kaleys believe, supra, at 5). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
It is a fact well known to certain Episcopalians—both those who have left the Episcopal Church (USA) and those who have remained—that ECUSA and its dioceses have followed a pattern of suing any church that chooses to leave for another Anglican jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 11:42 am by John Bellinger
Khobragade’s transfer from the Indian Consulate in New York, where she had been Deputy Consul General, and re-accreditation to India’s Mission to the United Nations; on Thursday, she was indicted for visa fraud and false statements by a grand jury in the Southern District of New York; the State Department then asked India to waive the immunity to which she was entitled under the U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ben Nighthorse Campbell, 409 F.3d 1234, 1235-36 (10th Cir. 2005); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 399 F.3d 527, 529 n.1 (2d Cir. 2005); United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm by Brian Shiffrin
  If you have a dispute about something that is occurring in grand jury in one of your cases, you may seek to have the County Court Part I Judge resolve the matter by requesting to see the judge with the prosecutor. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:28 pm by Wells Bennett
 There’s no grand jury review in advance of a capital referral in a military commission, but there very much is in civilian court. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:02 pm by Joe Patrice
[Forbes] * The Steubenville rape case is back in the news after a grand jury has indicted four school officials for covering up the school’s infamous rape. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:20 pm by Benjamin Wittes
We’re at a law school, so it’s appropriate to talk about the “theory of the case. [read post]