Search for: "Grant v. Walter" Results 661 - 680 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The question I’ve been asking in a series of recent posts is whether history can provide any insight into current claims that copyright law and the First Amendment conflict. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am by Christopher Tyner
After the trial court granted the motion to withdraw and announced new appointed counsel, the ADA told the trial court that the trial would need to be pushed back from the calendared date of December 16, 2019, to February 24, 2020, so that the new appointed counsel had time to become familiar with the case. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
The Genetic Literacy Project (GLP) asks: “Who is David and who is Goliath in the lobbying battle over agricultural biotechnology? [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 10:19 pm by MTTLR Blog Editor
A tongue-in-cheek website suggests not.1 The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), which is responsible for constructing and operating the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), insists that fears about LHC-generated catastrophes are wholly without scientific foundation.2 However, a group called the Citizens Against The Large Hadron Collider, established by nuclear physicist and former U.S. nuclear safety officer Walter L. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 3:09 pm by Francesca Procaccini
Alternatively, if the government can show after the fact that there is a compelling need to redact a transcript that overcomes the public’s right of access to court, then the judge may grant permission to seal or redact the transcript. [read post]