Search for: "Gregory v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Schachtman
Green & Joseph Sanders, “Admissibility Versus Sufficiency: Controlling the Quality of Expert Witness Testimony in the United States,” . [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:06 am by Ilya Somin
As Kennedy put it for the Court in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:02 am by Ilyse Schuman
Attorney Gregory Katsas, arguing on behalf of 26 state attorneys general, the National Federation of Independent Business and four private individuals, and Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr., who represents the United States, both asserted that the individual mandate is enforced by a penalty, not a tax, and is therefore not subject to the AIA. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am by Rob Robinson
High Court to Weigh Warrantless Use of GPS in Non-Criminal Cases - bit.ly/wZTp7P (Theresa Marangas, Benjamin Neidl) Open Records and FOIA – Pushing Government Technology into the 21st Century - bit.ly/xv2Ulg (Heidi Maher) Patel v Unite – Order For Investigation of Deleted Internet Forum - bit.ly/xsuqj7 (Chris Dale) Perspective on Legal Search and Document Review – bit.ly/wfbqR0 (Ralph Losey) Policy vs. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:42 am by WSLL
Corbin, 495 U.S. 508, 110 S.Ct. 2084, 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990) in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:19 am by WSLL
Westling, Senior Assistant Appellate Counsel.Representing Appellee: Gregory A. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:43 am by Gregory Eisenreich
" Schwab's insertion of this waiver language followed the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Richard Renner
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which applies to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits the use of excessive force by policemen in the course of an arrest, see, e.g., Graham v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
The rule of lenity is a propsition in United States law that states when statutes are contradictory or unclear any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of a defendant. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
The rule of lenity is a propsition in United States law that states when statutes are contradictory or unclear any ambiguity should be resolved in favor of a defendant. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:15 am by Kiran Bhat
The Montana Supreme Court upheld the ban in December, but three Montana corporations have asked the Supreme Court to stay the enforcement of that decision and, eventually, reverse it, on the ground that the lower court’s ruling conflicts with the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:50 am by Gregory Dell
In the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania case Gena N. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:10 am by WSLL
Trefonas, Trefonas Law, PC, Jackson, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Gregory A. [read post]