Search for: "Hale v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Although the statute did not expressly state this: 14. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:42 am by Sherry F. Colb
Stated differently, SA’s drawing of this equivalence constitutes a lie about a zygote being a baby. [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 1:27 pm
” The victims also point to the Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Mallory v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm by Stephen Griffin
Powell, Hale, Commons, Cohen, and Dewey.All very well, but what impact does this “historicist turn” have on conventional versions of the living Constitution as well as the standard debate between this point of view and originalism? [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm by Adam Wagner
Finally, he refers to the upcoming judgment of the Supreme Court in the appeal from the Court of Appeal’s decision in (A v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 4:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A claim for simple negligence is “restricted to those cases where the alleged negligent act is readily determinable by the trier of the facts on common knowledge,” whereas a claim for malpractice is one that typically requires expert testimony or other specialized knowledge (Hale v State of New York, 53 AD2d 1025, 1025 [4th Dept 1976]). [read post]