Search for: "Hall v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 4,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
United States Tulsi Gabbard, a U.S. congresswoman from Hawaii, dropped a defamation lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, according to a court filing. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
Such debate is just as important online as it is in our universities, our town halls, and our homes. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
[v] But, to contrary appearances, on February 27, 2020, the Law Society of Ontario (LSO) released its Priority Planning Committee’s Strategic Plan (LSO’s Treasurer (“President” in other provinces), Malcolm Mercer, being the Chair of the Committee). [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
But the First Amendment is quite clear that a state may enforce a neutral law of general applicability in Employment Div. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
(NYPL)Oliver Wendell Holmes’s dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 6:56 am by Mark Movsesian
My essay addresses some of the legal issues: whether bans are "generally applicable" under Employment Division v Smith, how courts might weigh the burden on religion against the state's interest in curbing the epidemic, whether less-restrictive means are available, etc. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am by Stan Gibson and Jessica Newman
Among his numerous successes is the $570M breach of contract and patent infringement verdict for his client in Medtronic v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
It was also the law that applied in two cases that are now part of the VARA Hall of Fame: Mass MoCA v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 24 conference)  Hall v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am by Jonathan Glasson QC
Lord Carnwath said that “the law must aspire to be a unified institution, the parts of which – contract, tort, the criminal law – must be in essential harmony” quoting McLachlin J in Hall v Hebert [1993] 2 SCR 15, 175-176. [read post]